Evaluate credibility and validity of sources of information

A claimant need not be injured on the job to apply for such coverage. There are several tests you can apply to a source to help you judge how credible and useful it will be: The criticism may be just, but because the messenger will gain financially if you believe the message, you should be very careful--and check somewhere else before spending money or believing the tale.

Although SSA is a program recognizing only permanent disability, cases are reviewed periodically for determination of continuing disability. In other states, chiropractors, as well as physicians, are free to provide impairment ratings on any body system eg, a psychiatrically, hematologically, oncologically, or neurologically related rating.

To help teachers decide what technology is the best to use, Professor Bell at Michigan State University designed this rubric: International Journal of Social Education, 21, Retrieved April 16,from http: Librarians have a greater responsibility in identifying core ideas within their own knowledge domain that can extend learning for students, in creating a new cohesive curriculum for information literacy, and in collaborating more extensively with faculty.

Someone who has been repeatedly noncompliant with mainstream medical treatment on a repeated basis and is using unproven, ineffective treatment alternatives may be less credible than a fully compliant patient.

Strategy List: 35 Dimensions of Critical Thought

Remember to use good judgment about information from forums such as Internet chat rooms and bulletin boards. There are several other ways of administering the questions. Even teachers who are not teaching technology literacy skills directly as part of the curriculum can still be modeling the use of the skills daily.

In short, technology is a human creation to enhance our abilities, extend our lives, or attain our wants and needs. This process of inquiry extends beyond the academic world to the community at large, and the process of inquiry may focus upon personal, professional, or societal needs.

Challenge Challenge information and demand accountability. As technology becomes more ubiquitous there are teachers who are dropping their textbooks and using internet-based resources to better meet their specific curricular needs. Once they can distinguish a good site from a bad one, students can begin evaluating the site for specific criteria using a rubric.

Have half of your friends had their cars stolen.

Objectives and Assessment

The Department of Defense ordered its use be limited to non-US persons, in overseas locations only. Require more credibility and evidence for stronger claims. In the future, wireless technology will be even more widely available, creating even more opportunities for collaboration.

At other times, the source may not disclose all of the information or may have a bias that is more subtle and difficult to detect.

It is important to encourage students not to believe everything they read, especially with more user-created resources like Wikipedia becoming popular research tools. In this lesson, you will learn how to evaluate your sources for reliability, credibility, and worth.

Reliability of Wikipedia

Purpose Before you evaluate your source, you need to first evaluate the purpose of your research. EasyBib — your online writing hub All the tools to submit your paper with confidence. Guidelines for evaluating Internet sources, including a checklist to help assure credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and supported claims.

Jun 24,  · Many health and medical Web sites post information that the owner has collected from other Web sites or sources. If the person or organization in charge of the site did not write the material, they should clearly identify the original source. Enroll in the Global Health Research Certificate Program.

Validity of Research. Though it is often assumed that a study’s results are valid or conclusive just because the study is scientific, unfortunately, this is not the case.

Evaluating the Credibility of Your Sources

S Developing Criteria for Evaluation: Clarifying Values and Standards. Principle: Critical thinkers realize that expressing mere preference does not substitute for .

Evaluate credibility and validity of sources of information
Rated 3/5 based on 44 review
Strategy List: 35 Dimensions of Critical Thought